So it’s a tie between both the processors in case of photo capture quality. Similarly, the Helio G80 has dual camera supports up to 16MP. The single-camera sensor supports up to 48MP with 30fps. In the Snapdragon 662, the dual camera supports up to 16MP. Hence, we can conclude that the Helio G80 has a better GPU unit than Snapdragon 662 and this will result in better visuals and graphics quality. In terms of GPU, according to Notebookcheck’s test, the Mali G52 MP2 has shown a 24% faster graphics rendering speed than the Adreno 610. Both GPUs are assigned to run at a maximum frequency of 950 MHz. Snapdragon 662 has the Adreno 610 GPU while the Helio G80 has the ARM-Mali G52 MP2. So there is no major difference if we consider the manufacturing process of both the processors, but a slight improvement in efficiency is observed on the Snapdragon 662 in comparison to the Helio G80. The Snapdragon 662 processor is built on 11nm LPP Process Technology while the MediaTek Helio G80 has been fabricated on 12nm FinFET Process Technology. Snapdragon 662 vs Helio G80 Comparison Manufacturing Process: In this article, we have made a raw comparison of both the processors considering the pros and cons. Whereas the Helio G80 processor is housed in the Realme Narzo 10 and Redmi 9 Prime smartphones. Moreover, the Oppo F17, Oppo A73, and Galaxy Tab A7 will also be powered by the Snapdragon 662. The Snapdragon 662 is housed in the Moto G9 which is already launched in the Indian market. Manufactured with powerful CPU and GPU units, both the processors deliver great performance while consuming lesser power. Both the processors are great competitors among themselves and are housed in entry-level and mid-range smartphones.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 and MediaTek Helio G80 were launched in early 2020.
0 kommentar(er)
